Real estate
Legal Matter AI for title defect & purchase dispute
A dispute about what was conveyed — an encumbrance nobody disclosed, a boundary that does not match the deed, a sale that did not complete as agreed.
What this case usually turns on
Notice and the chain. What the record shows was disclosed, when, and whether the chain of title actually supports what was conveyed.
Every element, checked against your file
A title defect & purchase dispute claim has to make out each of these. We read every page of the documents you upload and tell you which ones the record supports — and, just as importantly, which it does not.
Chain of title
The seller held what they purported to convey.
Usually shown by: The deed, prior conveyances, the title commitment or abstract.
Encumbrance or defect
Something burdens the title or the property was not as described.
Usually shown by: Recorded liens, easements, restrictive covenants, a survey that disagrees with the legal description.
Notice or disclosure
Whether the buyer was told, or should have discovered it.
Usually shown by: The disclosure statement, the title commitment's exceptions, correspondence before closing, recorded instruments.
Reliance
The buyer proceeded on the basis of what they were told.
Usually shown by: The purchase agreement, correspondence, the closing file.
Damages
A measurable loss follows from the defect.
Usually shown by: Valuations, cure estimates, the difference between price and value.
What that looks like in the report
Chain of title — Supported. Cited to the page it came from.
Encumbrance or defect — Supported. Cited to the page it came from.
Notice or disclosure — Not supported. Nothing in this record makes it out. The disclosure statement, the title commitment's exceptions, correspondence before closing, recorded instruments would answer it.
Reliance — Supported. Cited to the page it came from.
Damages — Supported. Cited to the page it came from.
“Not supported” means not in the documents you uploaded — never that your case fails. These are the elements such a claim commonly requires, not the law of any jurisdiction, and everything is for an attorney to weigh.
What to upload
The more of the file it has, the more it can tell you is missing. Scans are fine — they are read with OCR.
- The deed and any prior conveyances you hold
- The title commitment or abstract, including the exceptions schedule
- The survey and the legal description
- The purchase agreement and every amendment
- The seller's disclosure statement
- The closing file and settlement statement
- Correspondence between the parties and with the title company
What you get back
- Whether the chain of title in your documents actually supports what was conveyed
- Every recorded encumbrance the file mentions, with where it appears
- What was disclosed and when — the notice question, answered from the record
- A dated chronology of the transaction from offer to closing
Why it beats reading it yourself
- Title commitments hide the point in an exceptions schedule nobody reads to the end
- The survey and the legal description are compared against each other, in full
- Finding that a disclosure is NOT in the file is as useful as finding one that is
What the report contains
One document, every time. You say what to focus on and it leads with that — but you get the whole picture, because a file rarely turns out to hinge on the thing you expected.
Response to your request
Your question, answered directly, up front
Element coverage
Each element supported or not, with the citation
Chronology
Every dated event in order
Key facts & parties
What the documents establish, and who is who
Evidence both ways
What helps, what hurts, and what is missing
Questions to ask
Built from the gaps, for deposition or discovery
Suggested draft language
A passage you can adapt, cited throughout
Attorney review notes
What you must decide or verify
What it does not do
- It has no case law and no access to anything outside your matter. It answers from the documents you upload and cites them.
- It does not give legal advice or decide whether a claim succeeds. A supervising attorney approves every report before it is written.
- Elements vary by jurisdiction. Those above are what such a claim commonly requires — your state’s law governs.
A full analysis of a typical matter costs
$49.99 – $199.99
Estimated and approved before it runs, then settled to what it actually used. Asking a quick question costs a fraction of that.
Different kind of case? See all case types — the tool works on any matter, whether or not we hold a checklist for it.